SolidWorks Simulation- Mesh Controls , SolidWorks Simulation- Mesh Controls

SolidWorks Simulation- Shell Symmetry Fixture SolidWorks Simulation- Shell Symmetry Fixture

SolidWorks Simulation- Advanced Restraints , SolidWorks Simulation- Advanced Restraints

SolidWorks Simulation- Easy Results Plot Editing SolidWorks Simulation- Easy Results Plot Editing

SolidWorks Simulation- Flow Simulation Lids Video , SolidWorks Simulation- Flow Simulation Lids Video

SolidWorks Simulation- Automatic Mixed Mesh , SolidWorks Simulation- Automatic Mixed Mesh

SolidWorks SimulationXpress…it’s FREE! Use it!
(there’s a complimentary bonus link at the end)

What can SimulationXpress do?

1. Part analysis
2. Stress analysis
3. Optimization analysis with one variable and criterion
4. Analysis management using Simulation study tree
5. Isotropic materials
6. Uniform pressure and force on faces
7. Fixed restraints on faces
8. Stress contour plot-equivalent (von Mises) stress
9. Deformation plot
10. Factor of safety calculation and plot
11. Generate reports
12. Publish SolidWorks eDrawings of analysis results
13. Animate and save as AVI

Compress it…

Bend it…

Twist it…

Evaluate Factor of Safety…

Optimize it…

You have created a Simulation study of a fairly large assembly.  It has a mixed mesh – Solid elements, also Shell elements, maybe also some Beams.  You are relying on the GLOBAL CONTACT – BONDED to tie together all the mesh bodies of similar type.  You spent maybe 40 minutes, at least, creating the BONDED contact conditions to tie the dissimilar mesh elements together.
 And now when you try to run the study, you get the failure message, “Zero or indefinite stiffness matrix”.
 Ugh.  That means that at least one component is not correctly bonding to a neighbor, and so is free-floating.  But which one?  Since the study won’t run, you can’t display the displacement plot, and see which part(s) are flying off the screen.  How to diagnose this – without wasting the entire morning?  There are two ways I approach solving the problem, and they both use the study Property option, “Use Soft Springs to Stabilize the Model”.
1:  Moving
Sometimes you can simply turn ‘soft springs’ on, and run the study again.  About half the time, I find that the study will now run, (and produce a warning message, that very large displacements were detected).  Tell it to continue running the study anyway, as-is, without turning on the large-displacement flag.  Then, when you plot the Displacement results, you might very well be looking at an empty screen, or you might see that one (or more) parts seem to be missing from the plot.  They are not missing – they simply went flying off the screen.  Set your Displacement scale factor to be wicked small, (think many leading zeros), and then animate the displacement plot – and you’ll see at the start of the animation, which parts are un-tethered, and in which directions they are free to wander.
A cool and easy trick.  Except that, I did say above, I use this trick “about half the time”.  Because the other half of the time, the applied loads might act directly on the under-restrained parts, in the same direction that they are free to move, and then the “Soft Springs” do not supply enough stabilization.  What to do then?
2:  Shaking
The second approach is to Shake the assembly, instead of moving it.  Create a new Modal Study, (this will require the Simulation license to be Simulation Professional or higher).  Set the Modal Study Properties to only ask for the lowest 2 mode-shapes, or maybe 3, but no more.  (this is a diagnosis, not a true study, so you want it to run fast).  Then you copy all your Restraints and Bonded conditions into the new study.
Wait – I did NOT say to re-create all your Restraints and Bonded contacts.  I  said “COPY” them.  This is a “tip within the tip”.  A lot of people I encounter still don’t know you can do this.  If you activate your first, “real” study, you can then select the folder for your Restraints, and DRAG that folder down to the row of tabs at the bottom of your screen, and DROP it into your new Modal study.  Done.  So creating this Modal study to diagnose your problem should take, like, 30 seconds tops.   You do NOT have to copy over your system of loads – just the restraints and bonding, because we are not going to ‘push’ your assembly in any particular direction, we are instead going to vibrate it in-place.
But, you DO still have to turn on the “Soft Springs” option to stabilize the model.
Ok, now you RUN the Modal study.   Because the underlying equations of the Modal study are being solved differently than a Static study, the problem will generally solve O.K. even with under-supported parts.  And, when you activate the plot for the lowest 2 or 3 mode-shapes, each one should show you some rigid-body motion, (and remember, it could also be a rotation!), of the part or parts that are un-tethered.   Animate the model-shape plot, and it will be patently obvious which parts are walking away, and in which directions.
Important caveat: The Modal Analysis method of diagnosing your problem, will NOT allow you to create sliding or intermittent Contact via the “No Penetration” gap elements.  If your problem also has that kind of Contact in it, you need to either ignore that contact for the purpose of diagnosis, (which will too sloppy, and you’ll have to ask for more Mode Shapes –  ignore the responses you know are not ‘real’);   Or, you could replace the Bonded contact, with either an Elastic Support, or a Spring Connector.  With either of these, make the Normal spring stiffness pretty high, but the tangential spring stiffness very low – and you WILL have over-supported the selected faces a little bit.  But again, you’re just looking for which parts want to walk away, not running the ‘real’ study yet, so we can throw a few darts.  And if the problem produces NO rigid-body modes when you’ve replaced the Gap elements with springs, then you know for sure that the Contact conditions are the real problem.
One of these two methods should solve the “Zero or Indefinite Matrix” problem for you, just about all the time.

Shell Edge to Beam Bonding

The bonding of shell edges that belong to surface or sheet metal bodies to beams, commonly used to simulate gusset plates connecting beams, is supported through manual contact set definitions.

Render Shell Thickness

Reaction Forces for Beams

A recent sales promotion has helped many new customers obtain a license of SolidWorks Premium, which includes lots of great Add-in functionality beyond SolidWorks Standard and SolidWorks Professional. Perhaps the most popular is SolidWorks Simulation, which provides full finite element analysis (FEA) capabilities for linear static (“stress/strain”) simulation. Also, those of you on a “floating” Network License may have access to a Simulation license. But many of you might not know how or where to get started with Simulation.
Where are the SolidWorks Tutorials? Where is the Help?
Well, Step 0 is you need to make sure SolidWorks Premium is installed! If it is not, then you won’t be able to do Step 1. If you need help installing (or modifying your current installation), then contact your CAD Administrator, or CAPINC customers on subscription can of course contact our Technical Support staff.
Step 1:  Turn on the “SolidWorks Simulation” Add-in. Launch SolidWorks and navigate to the Tools > Add-Ins… menu:


Check the left-hand box to turn on Simulation in this session. Checking the right-hand box will turn it on in every session from now on, which if you’re using a Network License may anger your coworkers who might want access to the license that you’ll keep grabbing!
Step 2: Open a Part or Assembly file. You will not see any Simulation user interface (icons or toolbars) unless a model file is open. It can be a new empty file, as long as you have one open.

Step 3: Browse the pull-down menus (usually hidden beneath the SolidWorks logo) to Simulation > Help > Tutorials. You could also browse instead to Help > SolidWorks Simulation > Tutorials. As long as the Add-In is on, and a model file is open, you will be able to see both of these menu options.

SolidWorks Simulation- Restraint Preview Icons Video

My company does not want to upgrade to EPDM; but they want to create a vaulting system which will index all files. I have been researching programs such as DBWorks, Conisio… I’m looking for comparable programs, or any extra info would be appreciated. Statement below is info from my VAR about SolidWorks Explorer and our 64 bit’s ~As is mentioned in many Microsoft forums, this is a Microsoft Windows limitation. Mapped, network locations cannot be indexed by Windows Search on Windows Vista x64 or Windows 7 x64, therefore they cannot be added to SolidWorks Explorer's search paths list. To workaround this limitation, you can make the files stored in the mapped, network location available offline. Files that are made available offline can be indexed by Windows Search and can therefore be added to the search files list since they will be stored locally. Search the Windows Help for "sync offline files" for more information on how to setup offline files. 476452 - Cannot enable Indexing service search for Workgroup PDM on Windows Server 2008 64-bit, Windows Server 2008 R2 64-bit, Vista 64-bit and Windows 7 64-bit operating systems – open - Until this is achieved we cannot consider Workgroup as being fully supported on Windows Server 2008. Please see KB S-054407 for manual methods to enable Indexing for the Operating systems in question. For SPR 476452 there will not be a Service Pack or future version delivered solution available for this limitation. However, SolidWorks Development and Technical Support have developed the attached instructions for a workaround which will configure these operating systems to enable the Indexing Service to work in concert with SolidWorks Workgroup PDM Search. These instructions do require changes to be made in the Window registry which should be done with caution and only by individuals comfortable with making registry edits~

Solidworks Flow Simulation can be used to study the fluid flow and heat transfer for a wide variety of engineering equipment. In this example we use Solidworks Flow Simulation to determine the efficiency of a counterflow heat exchanger and to observe the temperature and flow patterns inside of it. With Solidworks Flow Simulation the determination of heat exchanger efficiency is straightforward and by investigating the flow and temperature patterns, the design engineer can gain insight into the physical processes involved thus giving guidance for
improvements to the design.

 Determination of Hydraulic Loss in Solidworks Flow  Simulation

In engineering practice the hydraulic loss of pressure head in any piping system is traditionally split into two components: the loss due to friction along straight pipe sections and the local loss due to local pipe features, such as bends, T-pipes, various cocks, valves, throttles, etc. Being determined, these losses are summed to form the total hydraulic loss. Generally, there are no problems in engineering practice to determine the friction loss in a piping system since relatively simple formulae based on theoretical and experimental investigations exist. The other matter is the local hydraulic loss (or so-called local drag). Here usually only experimental data are available, which are always restricted due to their nature, especially taking into account the wide variety of pipe shapes (not only existing, but also advanced) and devices, as well as the substantially complicated flow patterns in them.

Flow Simulation presents an alternative approach to the traditional problems associated with determining this kind of local drag, allowing you to predict computationally almost any local drag in a piping system within good accuracy. Click File, Open. In the Open dialog box, browse to the Valve.SLDPRT model located in the Tutorial 1 - Hydraulic Loss folder and click Open (or double-click the part). Alternatively, you can drag and drop the Valve.SLDPRT file to an empty area of the SolidWorks window.

Model Description

In  Flow Simulation Project in Solidworks we consider flow in a section of an automobile exhaust pipe, whose exhaust flow is resisted by two porous bodies serving as catalysts for transforming harmful carbon monoxide into carbon dioxide.

Open the SolidWorks Model
1 Click File, Open.
2 In the Open dialog box, browse to theCatalyst.SLDASM assembly located inthe First Steps - Porous Media folderand click Open (or double-click theassembly). Alternatively, you can dragand drop the Catalyst.SLDASM file to an empty area of SolidWorks window.

Boundary Conditions Solidworks Flow Simulation Tutorial help you learn something

A boundary condition is required anywhere fluid enters or exits the system and can be
set as a Pressure, Mass Flow, Volume Flow or Velocity.
1 In the Flow right-click the Boundary Conditions icon

 Flow Simulation solidworks tutorial

This First Steps tutorial covers the flow of water through a ball valve assembly before and
after some design changes. The objective is to show how easy fluid flow simulation can be
using Solidworks Flow Simulation and how simple it is to analyze design variations. These two factors make Solidworks Flow Simulation the perfect tool for engineers who want to test the impact of their design changes.

A customer requested help creating the intersection between a loft and a sweep. He is working on a hairdryer and had already created the profiles to generate the lofted solid.